Teacher Responsibility: What it is and what it isn't

What teachers are responsible for and what we *aren’t*. An honest, realistic reflection on care, boundaries, and sustainable teaching.

Most teachers I know are very responsible people.

We take learning seriously. We take our students’ needs and wellbeing seriously. We care about planning, assessment, feedback, admin, motivation, outcomes, and about how students, parents, colleagues, managers, and institutions perceive us.

Often, we also feel guilty when things that are genuinely outside our control and outside the scope of our role don’t work out.

This is not a small issue.

Over time, this misplaced sense of responsibility leads to burnout, reduced effectiveness in the classroom, and increasing strain on schools and organisations. When teachers are exhausted and overwhelmed, learning suffers. Institutions then scramble to “fix” the problem, which often results in even more pressure being placed back on teachers.

It becomes a familiar cycle:

more responsibility, more guilt, more exhaustion, and less space for learning.

At the centre of this cycle is a confusion that is almost never explicitly named:

the difference between care and over-responsibility.

Why teachers take on too much responsibility

There are several reasons why teachers so easily take on responsibility that isn’t actually theirs. As you read, you may recognise more than one.

First, teachers are quite literally trained to care.

Many of us enter the profession because we care about language, or about education more broadly. We care about helping people communicate, access opportunities, and participate more fully in the world. Teaching attracts people with a strong sense of purpose and responsibility.

During teacher training, this care is encouraged, but it is rarely balanced with explicit guidance on boundaries.

Alongside classroom management techniques and our own experiences as students, we absorb powerful stories about what makes a “good teacher”: selfless, giving, endlessly available, sometimes strict but ultimately focused on students’ needs above all else.

Over time, this shapes a helper identity: a sense that we exist primarily for others.

If you are a woman teacher, this dynamic is often intensified. Social and cultural expectations already reward women for care, emotional labour, and self-sacrifice. Teaching then reinforces these patterns, making it even harder to distinguish between professional responsibility and over-giving.

ELT culture rewards availability, not sustainability

Another reason many of us take on too much responsibility is the culture we work in.

In ELT especially, availability is often treated as a point of professionalism. Being “flexible”, “responsive”, and “easy to work with” is praised, sometimes explicitly, sometimes through silence and expectations. Sustainability, on the other hand, is rarely discussed, and very very rarely rewarded.

We can see and experience this clearly in freelance and precarious work. When contracts are short-term, hours fluctuate, and future work is never guaranteed, many teachers feel they have to prove their worth constantly. Saying yes feels safer than saying no. Being available feels like insurance.

Even in more stable positions, expectations are often vague. What exactly does “being supportive” mean? How quickly should emails be answered? What counts as part of the role, and what is extra? In the absence of clear agreements, teachers often default to doing more (just in case!).

“Be flexible” sounds reasonable on the surface. But flexibility without limits quickly turns into permanent availability. And permanent availability slowly erases rest, focus, professional clarity, and any enjoyment in the work.

Over time, this creates a culture where exhaustion is normalised and boundaries are interpreted as a lack of commitment (when they are the very thing that makes good teaching possible).

Responsibility expands to fill institutional gaps

Responsibility also grows where institutions don’t define it clearly.

Many schools and organisations operate with chronic understaffing, unclear roles, or chaotic systems. Admin processes are inefficient. Communication is inconsistent. Decisions are delayed or avoided. When something doesn’t work, the resulting stress often affects the classroom, too.

In these environments, teachers step in because someone has to. It’s not our job but we answer questions that aren’t ours to answer and solve problems that shouldn’t be ours to solve. We compensate for missing structures with our time, energy, and emotional labour.

At first, this can even feel satisfying. We’re being helpful! We’re keeping things running! We’re protecting our students from the mess behind the scenes - yay us!

But over time, responsibility expands to fill every institutional gap. What began as a temporary fix becomes a permanent (unpaid) expectation. Because teachers are already trained to care, we often internalise this as personal responsibility rather than a systemic issue.

This is where responsibility becomes distorted. We start taking on not just our role, but the weight of organisational dysfunction without authority, support, or acknowledgment.

And that weight is heavy.

A simple, useful definition: what responsibility actually is

At this point, it’s worth pausing and being very clear about what I mean by responsibility in teaching.

I want to stress that the problem isn’t that teachers don’t take responsibility seriously. it’s that we often take responsibility too seriously and too broadly.

So here’s the definition I find most useful:

A teacher’s responsibility is to create the conditions in which learning can happen, not to control the outcome.

This might sound simple, but it’s a profound adjustment.

“Creating conditions” means focusing on what is within our influence:

the learning environment, the structure of the lesson or course, the clarity of input, the emotional climate of the classroom, and the boundaries that make learning possible.

“Controlling outcomes”, on the other hand, would require us to manage things that are fundamentally outside our reach:

students’ motivation, their cognitive capacity on any given day, their personal lives, their stress levels, their prior educational experiences, and the amount of time and energy they can or will invest.

When we confuse these two - conditions and outcomes - responsibility becomes distorted.

We start feeling accountable for whether students learn, rather than for whether learning was possible.

We feel responsible for engagement, results, progress, satisfaction, retention, and success, even when those things depend on factors we cannot see, let alone control.

This confusion is one of the main drivers of teacher burnout.

Responsible teaching does not mean guaranteeing results. It means coming to work prepared, present, and regulated, and then allowing learning to emerge where it can.

Learning is a relational process. It happens at the intersection of teaching, student agency, context, and time. The teacher shapes part of that field (an important part!) but never the whole.

Seen this way, responsibility becomes something solid and workable, rather than endless and crushing. It has edges, sharp edges that make our care sustainable.

What is a teacher’s responsibility?

Once we define responsibility as creating the conditions for learning, not controlling outcomes, the picture becomes much clearer.

Teacher responsibility is not infinite. It is real, important, and bounded. Below are the core areas that do genuinely belong to us.

These responsibilities apply whether you’re teaching in a classroom, online, one-to-one, or through course materials. The context changes; the conditions for learning don’t.

1 Clear aims and coherent planning

Teachers are responsible for knowing what they are trying to teach and why.

This includes:

• having clear lesson or course aims
• sequencing activities in a way that supports those aims
• giving instructions that learners can follow
• making sure tasks build towards meaningful use of language

This means intentional plans, not perfect ones.

2 Creating psychological safety

Learning requires a basic sense of safety.

Teachers are responsible for shaping a classroom climate where:

• mistakes are treated as part of learning
• students are not shamed or ridiculed
• expectations are clear and predictable
• respect runs in all directions

Psychological safety about consistency, fairness, and emotional steadiness. Feeling that ‘you have to be nice all the time’ is exhausting and a wrong direction to take.

3 Managing your own nervous system

This part is rarely made explicit but it matters enormously.

Teachers bring their nervous systems into the room. Our tone, pace, facial expressions, and reactions shape how safe or unsafe the space feels.

A regulated teacher creates the conditions for focus and engagement.

A dysregulated teacher with excellent materials often creates noise, tension, or withdrawal.

Please remember: we are not responsible for how students feel at all times, but we are responsible for how we show up.

(Once again, this does not mean ‘being nice all the time.’)

4 Providing appropriate input

Teachers are responsible for offering language input that learners can work with.

That might be:

• inductive or deductive
• explicit or guided
• supported by examples, context, or modelling

There is no single “correct” method (I am a celta tutor and have many feelings about the ‘communicative approach’, but it’s just one of.)

Responsibility lies in choosing approaches that make learning accessible, not in trying to guarantee uptake. (Don’t try. It is not possible and will exhaust you and make you hate your students and your work.)

5 Creating opportunities for practice

Language is a skill, not a set of facts.

Teachers are responsible for creating opportunities for learners to:

• use the language
• experiment
• make mistakes
• receive feedback

This means less talking at students, and more space for students to do the work themselves.

6 Thoughtful, timely feedback and correction

Not all errors matter. Not all errors matter now.

Teachers are responsible for deciding:

• what to correct
• when to correct
• and how to do so without undermining confidence

Correction should serve learning, not our anxiety or perfectionism.

7 Clear structure and classroom management

Teachers are responsible for enough structure to support learning.

This includes:

• clear transitions
• workable groupings
• routines that reduce cognitive load
• boundaries that protect everyone’s ability to learn

This is the opposite of control: it’s about creating a boundaried container that allows learning to happen.

8 Encouragement and belief in learners

Teachers are responsible for holding a basic belief that learning is possible.

Encouragement, realistic optimism, and noticing progress all matter, often more than we realise.

Belief in our students means not giving up on them before they give up on themselves. <3

9 Professional boundaries

Finally — and this is crucial — teachers are responsible for maintaining professional boundaries.

Boundaries around:

• time
• availability
• communication
• emotional labour

These boundaries are not separate from teaching. They are part of the learning environment. Without them, responsibility becomes distorted and teaching becomes unsustainable.

What is not a teacher’s responsibility

Once responsibility is clearly defined, something else becomes possible: we can name what is not our responsibility.

This part is often uncomfortable and can feel like we’re being unreasonable. This discomfort happens because nobody ever talks about it, and it can feel shameful, selfish, wrong.

It is incredibly important for our own wellbeing and the future of this profession, that we talk about it loudly and clearly. Please read the list below slowly - in fact, read it out loud if you can.

The points below are facts that we should internalize and lean on.

1 Students’ motivation

Teachers can influence motivation, but we do not control it.

Students arrive with their own histories, priorities, pressures, energy levels, and reasons for being in the classroom. Some are curious and engaged. Others are tired, anxious, distracted, or ambivalent. All of this exists before we begin teaching.

A teacher’s responsibility is to make learning possible and worth engaging with, not to manufacture motivation out of nothing.

When we take responsibility for students’ motivation, teaching quickly turns into emotional labour with no clear endpoint (number one reason for burnout, if you were wondering.)

2 How much a student actually learns

Learning is not linear, predictable, or evenly distributed. This is a fact. Learning does not follow coursebook units.

Teachers cannot control:

• how quickly students process information
• how much they remember
• what connects with prior knowledge
• what falls away and returns later

We are responsible for the quality of teaching, not for guaranteeing learning outcomes.

Confusing these two leads teachers to carry responsibility for something that is, by its nature, shared and uncertain.

3 Students’ emotional lives

Teachers create an emotional climate.

We do not manage students’ internal emotional worlds.

Students bring stress, insecurity, trauma, family pressures, and personal struggles into the classroom. We can respond with respect and care, but we cannot — and should not try to! — attempt to regulate those experiences for them.

Teachers are not therapists. Trying to be one usually harms both teaching and wellbeing.

4 Learning that happens outside the classroom

Teachers are not responsible for:

• whether students practise
• whether they revise
• whether they do homework
• whether they prioritise learning

We can design meaningful tasks, explain their value, and encourage follow-through. But what happens outside the classroom belongs to the learner.

Taking responsibility for this often leads to frustration, resentment, and over-control (which take lots of effort and lead to … burnout. Yes.)

5 Institutional dysfunction

Teachers are not responsible for fixing:

• understaffing
• poor communication
• unclear policies
• unrealistic workloads
• broken systems

When institutions fail to hold responsibility clearly, it often slides onto teachers instead. Teachers taking up institutional responsibilities is NOT professionalism! It is displacement with a harsh price (bingo! Burnout.)

Naming this matters, because no amount of individual care can compensate for structural problems.

6 Being constantly available

Availability is not the same as responsibility.

Teachers are not responsible for:

• replying immediately
• being reachable at all hours
• absorbing made up urgency

Clear response times and communication boundaries protect learning rather than undermine it. They create predictability, fairness, and sustainability.

Teaching is a profession, not an emergency service.

7 Students’ life outcomes

Teachers influence lives — sometimes profoundly — but we do not carry responsibility for outcomes such as:

• exam results
• promotions
• visas
• career changes
• personal success

These outcomes sit at the intersection of many forces. Teaching is one of them and it’s important, but not all-powerful.

When teachers carry responsibility for students’ futures, the weight becomes impossible.

Letting go of these responsibilities is an act of professional clarity.

When responsibility is properly boundaried, teachers can show up with more presence, more patience, and more consistency, which is precisely what learning requires.

An illustration - a demo, if you will 

Exam classes are where distorted responsibility often shows up most clearly.

A month or so ago, I was talking to a colleague who teaches exam preparation. She’s experienced, conscientious, and deeply committed to her students. And she was exhausted.

She spoke about the pressure she feels before every exam session: the sleepless nights, the constant second-guessing, the sense that if her students don’t pass, it means she has failed. Not just professionally, personally.

This is a familiar story.

Exam classes invite a very specific confusion: the idea that the teacher is responsible for the result.

At some point in our conversation, I asked her to imagine something different.

Imagine a boxing match.

Two fighters enter the ring. They’ve trained for months. One of them loses.

Now imagine the coach dropping to his knees in shame.

The audience turns on him, shouting that he failed.

People surround the coach, criticising his technique, his preparation, his decisions.

Meanwhile, the boxer who actually fought the match is standing to the side, calmly unwrapping his hands, watching all of this happen.

Something about that image is obviously wrong.

We understand instinctively that the coach played a role - an important one - but did not throw the punches. The coach prepared the conditions: training, strategy, support. The fighter stepped into the ring and did the fight.

And yet, in exam classes, teachers often put themselves in the position of that kneeling coach.

If students pass, it’s a relief.

If they fail, it feels like personal failure.

But exams, like boxing matches, are moments where many factors converge:

preparation, performance on the day, stress, health, confidence, decision-making, and sometimes sheer luck.

The teacher’s responsibility is real, but it ends before the exam begins.

We prepare students.

We structure learning.

We explain, practise, revise, give feedback, and support.

What happens in the exam room belongs to the learner.

When teachers take responsibility for exam outcomes, teaching becomes saturated with anxiety. Lessons tighten. Control increases. Fear replaces curiosity. And ironically, learning often suffers.

Seeing responsibility clearly doesn’t make teachers careless.

It makes them effective.

It allows them to prepare students well, and then let go.

A tool to help you assess whether you want to take on a new responsibility

When responsibility starts to feel heavy, diffuse, or urgent, it can help to pause and take stock: see where you really are, what is really going on.

Here’s a simple practice I often come back to. You can use it in the moment, or reflect on it later.

Before taking on responsibility (or blaming yourself for perceived failure), ask yourself:

• Is this necessary to create the conditions for learning?
• Is this within my role as a teacher?
• Is this sustainable if I do it regularly?
• Am I choosing this freely, or responding from guilt, fear, or habit?

Asking these questions can be enough to bring responsibility back into proportion and to remind yourself that not everything that feels urgent is actually yours to carry.

This matters to teacher wellbeing 

When responsibility is unclear or limitless, it doesn’t just affect workload; it affects the nervous system.

Chronic over-responsibility keeps teachers in a state of vigilance: scanning for problems, anticipating failure, bracing for consequences that may never come. Over time, this leads to exhaustion, resentment, and a narrowing of attention.

Ironically, this is when teaching often becomes less effective.

Clear responsibility, on the other hand, creates space. It allows teachers to be present rather than hypervigilant, responsive rather than reactive. It supports steadier energy, clearer boundaries, and more sustainable care for students and for ourselves.

Wellbeing is not something added on after teaching is done. It is shaped, every day, by what we believe we are responsible for. 

Teachers are responsible, deeply and meaningfully so.

But responsibility is not the same as carrying everything.

When we understand our role clearly, we can teach with care and with limits. We can prepare well, show up fully, and still let go of what isn’t ours.

That kind of responsibility doesn’t diminish teaching.

It makes it possible to keep doing it with integrity, clarity, and a more ease.

I’ll continue exploring teacher responsibility in future writing and workshops.

If this resonated, you’re very welcome to stay here and read (or listen) along.

You can sign up for my newsletter, This teaching life, here: www.artofelt.com

Categories: : ELT, emotional labor, emotional regulation, language teacher, teacher burnout, teacher wellbeing, teaching systems